Is induction of labor a reasonable option for breech presentation?

15Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Whereas spontaneous onset of labor and vaginal delivery for breech presentation is considered to be a safe and effective option in selected cases, the safety of induction of labor is not established yet. The objectives of this study were to describe the outcomes of pregnancy in women induced with a fetus in breech presentation and compare the outcomes with those undergoing planned cesarean delivery. Material and methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the observational prospective multicenter PREMODA study, including all singleton breech deliveries after 37 weeks in 174 centers in France and Belgium. We excluded women with spontaneous onset of labor, scarred uterus or intrauterine fetal death. Our study population consisted of women with either induction of labor or planned cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was the composite criteria of neonatal mortality and serious morbidity used in the Term Breech Trial and in the PREMODA prospective cohort. Results: Our study population consisted of 4138 women, 218 with induction of labor and 3920 with planned cesarean. Two-thirds (67.4%) of the women in the induction of labor group delivered vaginally. There was no significant difference between the groups for the primary outcome (48 [1.2%] in the planned cesarean group vs 3 [1.4%] in the induction of labor group, P = 0.75). Moreover, none of the criteria of the composite primary outcome was significantly more frequent in the induction of labor group. Conclusions: Induction of labor for breech presentation does not seem to increase neonatal mortality or severe neonatal morbidity compared with planned cesarean delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaillard, T., Girault, A., Alexander, S., Goffinet, F., & Le Ray, C. (2019). Is induction of labor a reasonable option for breech presentation? Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 98(7), 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13557

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free