Rationalization

0Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to explain that Husserl’s conception of the function of a priori or eidetic material sciences, i.e., that of providing a full rationalization of the empirical, is deemed to be in line with the project of modern pre-Kantian philosophy, to which Husserl intends to steadily reconnect. We will also take into account Husserl’s interpretation of B. Spinoza to argue that his philosophical project should not be understood in opposition to traditional metaphysics, but rather as an attempt at purging metaphysics of its mistakes. In particular, the claim will be advanced that Husserl does not intend to reject traditional metaphysics, but only its understanding of the overall rationality of being based on the model of just one material a priori science, i.e., geometry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Santis, D. (2021). Rationalization. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 114, pp. 225–246). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69528-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free