Dermoscopic Image Segmentation: A Comparison of Methodologies

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An accurate segmentation of pigmented lesions may improve classification results of Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) tools. Thus, finding a reliable segmentation methodology becomes crucial. During the past few years, many segmentation methodologies of dermoscopic images have been proposed. In this paper, a comparison between three methodologies is presented: semantic segmentation with SegNet, histogram-based segmentation via convex optimization and segmentation based on a Fully Convolutional Network (FCN). As a result of evaluating the segmentation results for 600 dermoscopic images from the Test set of ISIC-2017 database, the semantic segmentation provides a 90.12% of accuracy, followed by segmentation using histograms and Fully Convolutional Network, with 86,47% and 81,70% of accuracy, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vélez Núñez, P., Serrano, C., Acha, B., & Pérez-Carrasco, J. A. (2020). Dermoscopic Image Segmentation: A Comparison of Methodologies. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 76, pp. 421–426). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31635-8_51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free