Fuck Autonomy: Neo-Orientalism and Abjection in Michel Houellebecq's Soumission

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the author critically analyses Michel Houellebecq's novel Soumission (Flammarion, 2017). The analysis uses post-structural theories of discourse, gender, and post-colonialism. The author argues that the novel employs neo-orientalist modes of identification where abjection is a fundamental theme. A neo-orientalist mode of identification refers to how knowledge about Muslims as an abject other is produced through various discursive techniques of differentiation, and how this performative practice is articulated through contingent conceptions of race, religion, and gender. Abjection refers to a symbolic castration, namely the central theme of how Western masculinity and European civilization has been de-masculinized by social democracy, liberalism, globalization, and feminism. Finally, the analysis of the novel is contrasted and compared with Houellebecq's earlier writings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nilsson, P. E. (2019). Fuck Autonomy: Neo-Orientalism and Abjection in Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission. European Review, 27(4), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798719000206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free