Density-dependent calibration of multisensor capacitance probes in coarse soil

  • Zettl J
  • Huang M
  • Barbour S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Zettl, J. D., Huang, M., Barbour, S. L. and Si, B. C. 2015. Density-dependent calibration of multisensor capacitance probes in coarse soil. Can. J. Soil Sci. 95: 331–336. Coarse-textured reconstructed soils are utilized extensively in the reclamation of mining waste. Accurate and continuous sensing of soil water content is required to understand soil water dynamics and evaluate the hydraulic characteristics of these soils. The EnviroSCAN (Sentek Pty. Ltd, Australia) is a semi-permanent multisensor capacitance probe (MCP) capable of continuous measurement of volumetric water content (θ v ) and has been used to monitor reclamation soil cover performance. Calibration of these probes is required to improve the accuracy of field measurements. In this study, field and laboratory measurements were undertaken over a range of water contents and bulk densities to refine the relationship between θ v and scaled frequency (SF) measured by the MCP. The manufacturer's calibration equation tended to underestimate θ v under wet conditions (θ v >0.35 cm 3 cm –3 ). Our experimental data showed that bulk density (ρ b ) did affect the MCP calibration and consequently a new calibration equation that includes the effect of ρ b is developed using laboratory measurements and validated using field measurements. This equation provided the highest degree of correlation and the smallest standard deviation of prediction to measured values of θ v for laboratory and field measurements, respectively. This calibration improves the application of the EnviroSCAN for coarse-textured soils such as those utilized in this study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zettl, J. D., Huang, M., Barbour, S. L., & Si, B. C. (2015). Density-dependent calibration of multisensor capacitance probes in coarse soil. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 95(4), 331–336. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss-2015-021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free