What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy?

104Citations
Citations of this article
84Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background The goal of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is to delay or prevent osteoarthritic development in dysplastic hips. However, it is unclear whether the surgical goals are achieved and if so in which patients. This information is essential to select appropriate patients for a durable PAO that achieves its goals. Questions/purposes We therefore (1) determined hip survival rates; (2) determined how many preserved hips were functionally unsuccessful after PAO; and (3) identified demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors predicting failure after PAO. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 316 patients (401 hips) who had PAO between December 1998 and May 2007. We evaluated radiographic parameters of dysplasia and osteoarthritis and obtained WOMAC scores. Through inquiry to the National Registry of Patients, we identified conversions to THA. Risk factors for conversion to THA were assessed. Minimum followup was 4 years (mean, 8 years; range, 4-12 years). Results The overall Kaplan-Meier hip survival rate was 74.8% at 12.4 years. A WOMAC pain score of 10 or more, suggesting clinical failure, was observed in 13% of preserved hips at last followup.Higher age, preoperativeTönnis grade of 2, incongruent hip, postoperative joint space width of 3 mmor less, and postoperative center-edge angle of less than 30° or more than 40° predicted conversion to THA. Conclusions PAO preserved three of four hips with most functioning well at 4- to 12-year followup. When planning surgery, surgeons should attempt to achieve hip congruence and a center-edge angle of between 30° to 40° to improve the durability of PAO. © The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons® 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartig-Andreasen, C., Troelsen, A., Thillemann, T. M., & Søballe, K. (2012). What factors predict failure 4 to 12 years after periacetabular osteotomy? In Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Vol. 470, pp. 2978–2987). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2386-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free