Prognostic significance of Ki67 in Chinese women diagnosed with ER+/HER2- breast cancers by the 2015St. Gallen consensus classification

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the distribution pattern of the Ki67-labeling index (LI) among patients at a Chinese breast cancer center, and analyzed its prognostic significance in the 2015St Gallen consensus breast cancer classification, estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative(ER+/HER2-)subtype. Methods: We classified 939 women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer into three groups by Ki67-LI levels, and followed their clinicopathologic characteristics and prognoses. Results: In the 939 eligible subjects, 342 had Ki67-LI ≤10% (Ki67Low), 281 had Ki67-LI between 10 and 30% (Ki67Medium), and 316 had Ki67-LI ≥30% (Ki67High). Although the Ki67High group had less favorable clinicopathologic factors, the Ki67Medium group's factors varied considerably. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that disease-free survival(DFS) for the Ki67Medium group was significantly shorter than the Ki67Low group but longer than the Ki67High group. Ki67-LI had independent prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. Other diagnostic factors, including tumor size >2cm, positive lymph nodes, and grade III disease, were significantly associated with poorer disease-free survival only in the Ki67Medium group. Conclusions: For patients with ER+/HER2- breast cancer, we confirmed three distinct risk patterns by Ki67-LI levels according to the 2015St Gallen consensus. For patients with clearly low or high Ki67-LI, straightforward clinical decisions could be offered, but for patients with intermediate Ki67-LI, other factors might provide valuable information.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, Y., Gu, R., Zhao, J., Yang, Y., Liu, F., Jin, L., … Jia, W. (2017). Prognostic significance of Ki67 in Chinese women diagnosed with ER+/HER2- breast cancers by the 2015St. Gallen consensus classification. BMC Cancer, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-3021-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free