Introduction: Law 21.030 incorporates conscientious objection for health personnel inside the surgical ward and allows its invocation by private institutions. It has been considered a conflict of interest, not monetary, by putting personal values first, affecting the fulfillment of professional duty. Objective: To establish the prevalence of objectors in the country's public network hospitals and characterize them according to age, gender, and nationality. Method: Quantitative, analytical, and cross-sectional study. Central and dispersion trend measures were used. For measuring the association between sociodemographic variables, profession and causal objected, test χ2, Fisher exact and Kruskal-Wallis test were used. Results: In 57 hospitals, a higher frequency of objectors were observed in the third causal. In 443 objectors, the median age was 43 years, 64.8% are women, and 87.4% are Chilean. The central and southern areas of the country have the highest proportion of hospitals, with more than 50% objectors. Conclusions: The difficulty for obtaining the information prevents fully knowing the magnitude of conscientious objection in Chile. The high prevalence of objectors, specifically in the causal violation is worrying. The conscientious objection cannot operate as a barrier that violates the rights and dignity of women.
CITATION STYLE
Montero, A., Ramírez-Pereira, M., Robledo, P., Casas, L., Vivaldi, L., Molina, T., & González, D. (2022). Prevalencia y características de objetores de conciencia a la Ley 21.030 en instituciones públicas. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecología, 86(6). https://doi.org/10.24875/rechog.21000006
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.