The Nature of “Evidence” in Qualitative Research Methods

  • Miller S
  • Fredericks M
19Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The article is an attempt to show that a continuing issue in qualitative research methods is describing and justifying how qualitative data become “evidence” for a claim. Several models from the field of Confirmation Theory are developed and described within the context of a qualitative research example. It is argued that for the qualitative research case, the meaning and application of what constitutes evidence is best viewed in terms of a primary logical distinction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, S., & Fredericks, M. (2003). The Nature of “Evidence” in Qualitative Research Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free