Strategies for data collection on a CCD-diffractometer

14Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The introduction of area detectors has led to a significant reduction of the time needed for measuring a complete set of X-ray reflections. The default parameters suggested by the manufacturer of the instrument lead to good results, but both the software and the hardware provide the possibility of varying numerous parameters in order to optimize the quality of the data set. The influence of parameters (measuring time, scan angle, crystal-to-detector distance, collimator radius, detector resolution, redundancy, crystal size and scan type) is determined and rated with regard to their importance for the quality of the data. The investigations were carried out on a Siemens (now Bruker AXS) CCD diffractometer on three small organic molecules, p-nitrobenzaldehyde diacetate [P21/n; Z = 4; a = 10.785(2) Å; b = 7.420(2) Å; c = 15.407(2) Å; β = 107.30(1)°] and p-methoxyacetophenone [P21/c; Z = 4; a = 10.158(2) Å; b = 7.917(2) Å; c = 10.287(2) Å; β = 103.72(3)°], of which the crystal structures were determined. An optimized strategy for the data collection is proposed and the attainable improvement is shown by comparing the data sets based on the default parameters and the data sets obtained with the optimized strategy for the three structures examined. However, different strategies may be needed for more strongly absorbing materials.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruhl, S., & Bolte, M. (2000). Strategies for data collection on a CCD-diffractometer. Zeitschrift Fur Kristallographie, 215(9), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1524/zkri.2000.215.9.499

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free