Comparing rule measures for predictive association rules

69Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We study the predictive ability of some association rule measures typically used to assess descriptive interest. Such measures, namely conviction, lift and χ2 are compared with confidence, Laplace, mutual information, cosine, Jaccard and φ-coefficient. As prediction models, we use sets of association rules. Classification is done by selecting the best rule, or by weighted voting. We performed an evaluation on 17 datasets with different characteristics and conclude that conviction is on average the best predictive measure to use in this setting. We also provide some meta-analysis insights for explaining the results. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azevedo, P. J., & Jorge, A. M. (2007). Comparing rule measures for predictive association rules. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4701 LNAI, pp. 510–517). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74958-5_47

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free