Automated Electronic Phenotyping of Cardioembolic Stroke

21Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Oral anticoagulation is generally indicated for cardioembolic strokes, but not for other stroke causes. Consequently, subtype classification of ischemic stroke is important for risk stratification and secondary prevention. Because manual classification of ischemic stroke is time-intensive, we assessed the accuracy of automated algorithms for performing cardioembolic stroke subtyping using an electronic health record (EHR) database. Methods: We adapted TOAST (Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) features associated with cardioembolic stroke for derivation in the EHR. Using administrative codes and echocardiographic reports within Mass General Brigham Biobank (N=13 079), we iteratively developed EHR-based algorithms to define the TOAST cardioembolic stroke features, revising regular expression algorithms until achieving positive predictive value ≥80%. We compared several machine learning-based statistical algorithms for discriminating cardioembolic stroke using the feature algorithms applied to EHR data from 1598 patients with acute ischemic strokes from the Massachusetts General Hospital Ischemic Stroke Registry (2002-2010) with previously adjudicated TOAST and Causative Classification of Stroke subtypes. Results: Regular expression-based feature extraction algorithms achieved a mean positive predictive value of 95% (range, 88%-100%) across 11 echocardiographic features. Among 1598 patients from the Massachusetts General Hospital Ischemic Stroke Registry, 1068 had any cardioembolic stroke feature within predefined time windows in proximity to the stroke event. Cardioembolic stroke tended to occur at an older age, with more TOAST-based comorbidities, and with atrial fibrillation (82.3%). The best model was a random forest with 92.2% accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 91.1% (95% CI, 87.5%-93.9%). Atrial fibrillation, age, dilated cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure, patent foramen ovale, mitral annulus calcification, and recent myocardial infarction were the most discriminatory features. Conclusions: Machine learning-based identification of cardioembolic stroke using EHR data is feasible. Future work is needed to improve the accuracy of automated cardioembolic stroke identification and assess generalizability of electronic phenotyping algorithms across clinical settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial

10286Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

3457Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UpSet: Visualization of intersecting sets

1341Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Outcomes in Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart–brain relationship in stroke

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to Toast Classification: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guan, W., Ko, D., Khurshid, S., Trisini Lipsanopoulos, A. T., Ashburner, J. M., Harrington, L. X., … Lubitz, S. A. (2021). Automated Electronic Phenotyping of Cardioembolic Stroke. Stroke, 52(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030663

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 25

71%

Researcher 6

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

44%

Computer Science 10

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

19%

Neuroscience 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free