Advocate is a free and independent profession. According to the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU–XIII/2015. It is interesting that the decision has decided the issue of oath in Article 4 Paragraph (1) Advocate Law, but affects Article 28 Paragraph (1) concerning Advocates Organization. This research is a normative research that uses conceptual approach and legislative approach, which hopefully can dig up and find out the position of Advo- cates Organizations after the Constitutional Court Decision number 112/PUU–XII/2014 & 36/PUU– XIII/2015. It is known from the research that the Constitutional Court is unauthorized to decide which organization is legitimate, although Advocates Organization can also be named as state institution.
CITATION STYLE
Widodo, M. F. S., Sudarsono, S., & Winarno, B. (2018). KEDUDUKAN ORGANISASI ADVOKAT SEBAGAI WADAH TUNGGAL PROFESI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i2p149-158
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.