Polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes for pediatric chronic constipation: An open-label clinical study in Japan

4Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Despite the abundance of study evidence for its efficacy and tolerability for the treatment of constipation in other countries, polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes (PEG3350+E) was not available in Japan until recently. The purpose of this study was to establish the efficacy and safety of PEG3350+E for the treatment of functional constipation in children in Japan. Methods: Japanese children aged 2–14 years with a mean spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) frequency of 2 times/week or less for at least 2 months prior to informed consent were enrolled into the study. After a 2-week screening period, treatment with PEG3350+E was initiated on the day of enrollment and continued for 12 weeks. Change in SBM frequency from screening period week 2 (baseline) to treatment period week 2 was set as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints and adverse events were also examined. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and completed the 12-week study period. The SBM frequency (mean ± SD) at baseline and treatment period week 2 was 1.00 ± 0.89 and 6.54 ± 4.38, respectively. The change in SBM frequency was 5.54 ± 4.55 (one-sample t test, P < 0.0001) and remained stable through week 12. Stool consistency was also improved over the entire treatment period. Three mild adverse drug reactions were reported: decreased appetite, abdominal pain, and diarrhea (each in 1 of 39 [2.6%] patients). Conclusion: PEG3350+E can be considered as a new treatment option for chronic constipation in children in Japan. Clinical trial registration number: Japic CTI-163167.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gondo, M., Nagata, S., Shinbo, K., Oota, A., & Tomomasa, T. (2020). Polyethylene glycol 3350 plus electrolytes for pediatric chronic constipation: An open-label clinical study in Japan. Pediatrics International, 62(5), 600–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.14102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free