On deniability in the common reference string and random oracle model

104Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We revisit the definitions of zero-knowledge in the Common Reference String (CRS) model and the Random Oracle (RO) model. We argue that even though these definitions syntactically mimic the standard zero-knowledge definition, they loose some of its spirit. In particular, we show that there exist a specific natural security property that is not captured by these definitions. This is the property of deniability. We formally define the notion of deniable zero-knowledge in these models and investigate the possibility of achieving it. Our results are different for the two models: - Concerning the CRS model, we rule out the possibility of achieving deniable zero-knowledge protocols in "natural" settings where such protocols cannot already be achieved in plain model. - In the RO model, on the other hand, we construct an efficient 2-round deniable zero-knowledge argument of knowledge, that preserves both the zero-knowledge property and the proof of knowledge property under concurrent executions (concurrent zero-knowledge and concurrent proof-of knowledge). © International Association for Cryptologic Research 2003.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pass, R. (2003). On deniability in the common reference string and random oracle model. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2729, 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45146-4_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free