Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002

56Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the characteristics of randomised controlled trials supported by the main non-commercial sources of funding in the United Kingdom between 1980 and 2002. Design: Descriptive survey. Setting: Randomised controlled trials funded by the Medical Research Council, NHS research and development programme, Department of Health, Chief Scientist Office in Scotland, and medical research charities. Participants: 1464 randomised controlled trials supported by the main non-commercial sources of funding. Results: Support for randomised controlled trials by the main sources of non-commercial funding in the United Kingdom has fallen in recent years, without any concomitant increase in the sample sizes of these studies. Drug trials in a limited range of health problems have dominated among the studies supported by the Medical Research Council and medical research charities. Until recently, the NHS research and development programme supported randomised controlled trials of various healthcare interventions, in a wide range of health problems, but between 1999 and 2002 many of the subprogrammes that had commissioned trials were discontinued. Conclusions: The future of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom has been threatened by the discontinuation or demise of national and regional NHS research and development programmes. Support also seems to be declining from the Medical Research Council and the medical research charities. It is unclear what the future holds for randomised controlled trials that address issues of no interest to industry but are of great importance to patients and practitioners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chalmers, I., Rounding, C., & Lock, K. (2003, November 1). Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002. British Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free