Systematic Analysis of Adverse Event Reports for Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Events

90Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Increasing evidence has shown that sex differences exist in Adverse Drug Events (ADEs). Identifying those sex differences in ADEs could reduce the experience of ADEs for patients and could be conducive to the development of personalized medicine. In this study, we analyzed a normalized US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Chi-squared test was conducted to discover which treatment regimens or drugs had sex differences in adverse events. Moreover, reporting odds ratio (ROR) and P value were calculated to quantify the signals of sex differences for specific drug-event combinations. Logistic regression was applied to remove the confounding effect from the baseline sex difference of the events. We detected among 668 drugs of the most frequent 20 treatment regimens in the United States, 307 drugs have sex differences in ADEs. In addition, we identified 736 unique drug-event combinations with significant sex differences. After removing the confounding effect from the baseline sex difference of the events, there are 266 combinations remained. Drug labels or previous studies verified some of them while others warrant further investigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, Y., Chen, J., Li, D., Wang, L., Wang, W., & Liu, H. (2016). Systematic Analysis of Adverse Event Reports for Sex Differences in Adverse Drug Events. Scientific Reports, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free