Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols

28Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to analyze a set of previously developed and proposed image segmentation protocols for precision in both intra- and inter-rater reliability for in vivo tooth volume measurements using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. METHODS: Six 3D volume segmentation procedures were proposed and tested for intra- and inter-rater reliability to quantify maxillary first molar volumes. Ten randomly selected maxillary first molars were measured in vivo in random order three times with 10 days separation between measurements. Intra- and inter-rater agreement for all segmentation procedures was attained using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The highest precision was for automated thresholding with manual refinements. CONCLUSIONS: A tooth volume measurement protocol for CBCT images employing automated segmentation with manual human refinement on a 2D slice-by-slice basis in all three planes of space possessed excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability. Three-dimensional volume measurements of the entire tooth structure are more precise than 3D volume measurements of only the dental roots apical to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forst, D., Nijjar, S., Flores-Mir, C., Carey, J., Secanell, M., & Lagravere, M. (2014). Comparison of in vivo 3D cone-beam computed tomography tooth volume measurement protocols. Progress in Orthodontics, 15, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0069-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free