Monitoring practitioner’s skills in pure-tone audiometry

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

So far, there exists no standard, to evaluate a practitioner’s skills in pure-tone audiometry. To narrow the gap, this article presents an artificial patient (AP) emulating various types of hearing impairment. In contrast to other solutions, the AP autonomously listens to real pure-tones in soft real-time, while taking into account elements from psycho-acoustics. The emulated patient profiles are reproducible. New profiles can be easily added. The AP is able to recover from error. In this contribution, the authors develop software requirements specifications and derive a modular system architecture. To analyze the performance, the article proposes a stochastic extension to existing synchronous data flow graphs, taking into account the unbounded nature of the tasks’ worst case response time. Maximization and summation over the graph reveals the joint distribution of the response time with first and second central moments corresponding to, respectively, the expected response time and the jitter of the task. The theoretical results have finally been validated by measurements on the target.

References Powered by Scopus

An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex fourier series

7680Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Synchronous data flow

1379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Healthcare robotics

209Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kocian, A., Chessa, S., & Grolman, W. (2020). Monitoring practitioner’s skills in pure-tone audiometry. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications, 11(2), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEHMC.2020040103

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 2

33%

Engineering 2

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

17%

Arts and Humanities 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free