Learning of semantic sibling group hierarchies - K-Means vs. Bi-secting-K-Means

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The discovery of semantically associated groups of terms is important for many applications of text understanding, including document vectorization for text mining, semi-automated ontology extension from documents and ontology engineering with help of domain-specific texts. In [3], we have proposed a method for the discovery of such terms and shown that its performance is superior to other methods for the same task. However, we have observed that (a) the approach is sensitive to the term clustering method and (b) the performance improves with the size of the results'list, thus incurring higher human overhead in the postprocessing phase. In this study, we address these issues by proposing the delivery of a hierarchically organized output, computed with Bisecting K-Means. We compared the results of the new algorithm with those delivered by the original method, which used K-Means using two ontologies as gold standards. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brunzel, M. (2007). Learning of semantic sibling group hierarchies - K-Means vs. Bi-secting-K-Means. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4654 LNCS, pp. 365–374). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74553-2_34

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free