Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study

20Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background The optimal resuscitation fluid for the early treatment of severe bleeding patients remains highly debated. The objective of this experimental study was to compare the rapidity of shock reversal with lactated Ringer (LR) or hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 at the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. To assess the influence of vascular permeability in this model, we measured plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels during the experiment. Methods Thirty-six anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated piglets were bled (<30 ml kg-1) to hold mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 40 mm Hg for more than 30 min and were resuscitated in two randomized groups: LR (n=14) or HES (n=14) at 1 ml kg-1 min -1 until MAP reached its baseline value of ±10%. MAP was maintained at its baseline value for 1 h. The time and fluid volume necessary to restore the baseline MAP value were measured. Results The time to restore the baseline MAP value of ±10% was significantly lower in the HES group (P<0.001). During the initial resuscitation phase, the infused volume was 279 (119) ml in the HES group and 1011 (561) ml in the LR group (P<0.0001). During the stabilization phase, the infused volume was 119 (124) ml in the HES group and 541 (506) ml in the LR group. Biological data and plasma VEGF levels were similar between the groups. Conclusions Restoration of MAP was four times faster with HES than with LR in the early phase of controlled haemorrhagic shock. However, there was no evidence of increased vascular permeability. © 2013 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roger, C., Muller, L., Deras, P., Louart, G., Nouvellon, E., Molinari, N., … Lefrant, J. Y. (2014). Does the type of fluid affect rapidity of shock reversal in an anaesthetized-piglet model of near-fatal controlled haemorrhage? A randomized study. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 112(6), 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free