The Intractability of Islamist Insurgencies: Islamist Rebels and the Recurrence of Civil War

12Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is a large research field focusing on the recurrence of civil wars, yet this literature has omitted to seriously consider religious dimensions and ideational features of armed conflicts. To address this gap, we provide the first global study exploring whether, and why, Islamist civil wars-A rmed conflicts fought over self-proclaimed Islamist aspirations-A re more or less likely to recur compared to other conflicts. We argue that civil wars fought over Islamist claims are more likely to relapse because the ideational features of these conflicts increase the uncertainty regarding the capabilities of the warring actors in terms of the extent and nature of transnational support that may be forthcoming, for rebels as well as the government. In line with our argument, we find that Islamist civil wars are significantly less likely to be terminated and more likely to recur once ended. Thus, our results demonstrate that Islamist civil wars represent a particular challenge with regard to the goal of achieving durable peace.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nilsson, D., & Svensson, I. (2021). The Intractability of Islamist Insurgencies: Islamist Rebels and the Recurrence of Civil War. International Studies Quarterly, 65(3), 620–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free