The cochlear implant controversy: Lessons learned for using anticipatory governance to address societal concerns of nano-scale neural interface technologies

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A shortcoming of public policy, according to Jeffery Greene (2005), is that it tends to be reactive and not proactive. That is to say, public policies tend towards addressing looming and existent public problems rather than preventing or foreseeing and circumventing future public problems. While the “reactive” nature of public policy might be contested in some scholarly or professional circles it is safe to say that the prevailing public policy making structures in modern democracies are often more inclined to respond to public problems rather than attempt to anticipate, circumvent, or prevent them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, D. (2013). The cochlear implant controversy: Lessons learned for using anticipatory governance to address societal concerns of nano-scale neural interface technologies. In Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future (pp. 147–158). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1787-9_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free