Skip to main content
Book Chapter

Reliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS)

  • Woods S
  • Walsh B
  • Powers A
  • et al.
Springer International Publishing, (2019), 85-113
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17336-4_5
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Structured Interview for Psychosis-risk Syndromes (SIPS) has been one of most commonly used instruments worldwide for diagnosing and evaluating subjects with a clinical high-risk (CHR) syndrome for psychosis. Early papers, book chapters, and monographs on the...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woods, S. W., Walsh, B. C., Powers, A. R., & McGlashan, T. H. (2019). Reliability, Validity, Epidemiology, and Cultural Variation of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS) and the Scale of Psychosis-Risk Symptoms (SOPS). In Handbook of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome Across Cultures (pp. 85–113). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17336-4_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free