"Have I kept inquiry moving?" On the Epistemology of Reflection

  • Molander B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Detractors of Schon's notion of "reflection in action" often point out that there is seldom time for reflection when a person is engaged in work. Such comments indicate an overly narrow conception of what reflection is. In this article it is argued that a practice, which occurs over a span of time, may be reflective without any particular activity called "reflection" being carried out. Though there is a diversity of forms of reflection in practice, it is argued that Schon's notion of "conversation"or "dialogue" can be developed so as to exhibit a structural similarity to various reflective practices. Reflection in action emerges, then, as a form of knowledge in action, as fallible as any other form of empirical knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Molander, B. (2008). “Have I kept inquiry moving?” On the Epistemology of Reflection. Phenomenology & Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/pandpr19811

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free