‘Negative Ureteroscopy’ for Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review

7Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose of Review: While ureteroscopy (URS) is a common procedure for ureteric stones, this window between diagnosis and treatment leaves the possibility for a ‘negative’, ‘stoneless’ or ‘diagnostic’ URS. We perform a systematic review to look at the rate of ‘negative ureteroscopy’ and risk factors associated with it. Recent Findings: From a total of 3599 articles and 68 abstracts, 4 studies (1336 patients) were selected. The negative URS rate varied from 4 to 14%. Common predictors seem to be female gender, small stones, radiolucent stones and distal ureteric stones. Summary: Although infrequent, negative ureteroscopy should be avoided in patients with ureteric stones by performing a low-dose CT scan on the day of surgery. This should especially be performed for females and those with smaller, radiolucent or distal ureteric stones.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rice, P., Prattley, S., & Somani, B. K. (2019, March 1). ‘Negative Ureteroscopy’ for Stone Disease: Evidence from a Systematic Review. Current Urology Reports. Current Medicine Group LLC 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-019-0878-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free