Suggested guidelines for the prescription of orthotic services, device delivery, education, and follow-up care: A multidisciplinary white paper

7Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: This article establishes needed guidelines for determining orthotic prescriber authority, documenting medical necessity, and ensuring continuity of care for patients needing orthoses. It also identifies “off-the-shelf” (OTS) devices that can safely and appropriately be delivered to patients without professional adjustment as well as those that cannot. Methods: A multidisciplinary task force made up of experts in orthopedics and physical medicine physicians, along with therapists and certified orthotists, applied a consensus approach to answer key questions: (i) When can a device be safely, effectively delivered to the patient OTS without professional guidance or education, and which caregivers have a role in that decision? (ii) What documentation is appropriate for physicians and other caregivers to determine medical necessity? (iii) What documentation/communication ensures continuity of care among physicians, therapists, and orthotists? Results: Guidelines developed for consideration of OTS orthoses include accepting documentation from collaborating caregivers, including therapists and orthotists; keeping that documentation as part of the patient’s total medical record for clinical, medical necessity determinations and reimbursement purposes; and using the physician’s prescription for the device as the key determinant of whether a device is delivered OTS or as a custom-fitted device. Conclusion: This review provides expert guidance for patient safety, minimizing wasted expenditures, maximizing clinical outcomes, and providing efficient delivery of care for Medicare and other patients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines should be directed toward recognizing the level of expertise of the orthotist, the value of their patient encounters, and their role in facilitating the timely, safe, and effective use of orthotic devices.

References Powered by Scopus

Attendance in voice therapy: Can an interdisciplinary care model have an impact

39Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Situational awareness, relational coordination and integrated care delivery to hospitalized elderly in the Netherlands: A comparison between hospitals

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An Interdisciplinary Memory Clinic: A Novel Practice Setting for Pharmacists in Primary Care

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A survey of client experiences with orthotics using the QUEST 2.0

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design, Applications, and Challenges of 3D-Printed Custom Orthotics Aids: A Review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3D-Printed Orthosis: A Review on Design Process and Material Selection for Fused Deposition Modeling Process

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fisk, J. R., DeMuth, S., Campbell, J., DiBello, T., Esquenazi, A., Lin, R. S., … Fise, T. F. (2016). Suggested guidelines for the prescription of orthotic services, device delivery, education, and follow-up care: A multidisciplinary white paper. Military Medicine, 181(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00542

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 5

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 10

56%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

17%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

17%

Sports and Recreations 2

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0