Evaluating a textual feature modelling language: Four industrial case studies

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Feature models are commonly used in software product line engineering as a means to document variability. Since their introduction, feature models have been extended and formalised in various ways. The majority of these extensions are variants of the original tree-based graphical notation. But over time, textual dialects have also been proposed. The textual variability language (TVL) was proposed to combine the advantages of both graphical and textual notations. However, its benefits and limitations have not been empirically evaluated up to now. In this paper, we evaluate TVL with four cases from companies of different sizes and application domains. The study shows that practitioners can benefit from TVL. The participants appreciated the notation, the advantages of a textual language and considered the learning curve to be gentle. The study also reveals some limitations of the current version of TVL. © 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hubaux, A., Boucher, Q., Hartmann, H., Michel, R., & Heymans, P. (2011). Evaluating a textual feature modelling language: Four industrial case studies. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6563 LNCS, pp. 337–356). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_23

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free