Co-creation and Evaluation of an Adapted Physical Activity Toolkit: Guidelines To Support Practice Among Rehabilitation Professionals in Community Organizations

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Limited knowledge and skills of health professionals is a common barrier when adapting physical activity for people with disabilities. A community organization (Adaptavie) identified the need for improved training and resources to facilitate APA prescription by their employees. The objectives of this research were to co-create an APA toolkit and evaluate implementation. Methods: A multi-method participatory research approach was used with kinesiologists who worked at Adaptavie. The project consisted of two phases: P1) co-creation of the toolkit; P2) implementation evaluation. Sociodemographic information (P1; P2), the Work self-efficacy Inventory Survey (P1; P2), the Indicators of Success Questionnaire (P2) and focus groups (P1 n = 3; P2 n = 1) were conducted with kinesiologists. Summary statistics were described (sociodemographic and questionnaires) and analysed thematically (focus groups). Results: The co-creation of an evidence-based training toolkit contained information about 45 types of disabilities. Five to eight kinesiologists (depending on the phase) reported improvements in workplace self-efficacy, skills and knowledge after using the APA toolkit for one year. Following implementation, the APA toolkit was reported to have a high level of usability and fidelity. Conclusion: A co-created APA toolkit supported kinesiologists to prescribe evidence-based APA programs by increasing their knowledge, skills and self-efficacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Serres-Lafontaine, A., Périnet-Lacroix, R., Batcho, C. S., & Best, K. L. (2023). Co-creation and Evaluation of an Adapted Physical Activity Toolkit: Guidelines To Support Practice Among Rehabilitation Professionals in Community Organizations. Physical Activity and Health, 7(1), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.239

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free