Prognostic significance of systemic inflammation-based lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with lung cancer: Based on a large cohort study

128Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates cancer-related inflammatory biomarkers show great promise for predicting the outcome of cancer patients. The lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) was demonstrated to be independent prognostic factor mainly in hematologic tumor. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of LMR in operable lung cancer. We retrospectively enrolled a large cohort of patients with primary lung cancer who underwent complete resection at our institution from 2006 to 2011. Inflammatory biomarkers including lymphocyte count and monocyte count were collected from routinely performed preoperative blood tests and the LMR was calculated. Survival analyses were calculated for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 1453 patients were enrolled in the study. The LMR was significantly associated with OS and DFS in multivariate analyses of the whole cohort (HR= 1.522, 95% CI: 1.275-1.816 for OS, and HR =1.338, 95% CI: 1.152-1.556 for DFS). Univariate subgroup analyses disclosed that the prognostic value was limited to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (HR: 1.824, 95% CI: 1.520-2.190), in contrast to patients with small cell lung cancer (HR: 1.718, 95% CI: 0.946-3.122). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that LMR was still an independent prognostic factor in NSCLC. LMR can be considered as a useful independent prognostic marker in patients with NSCLC after complete resection. This will provide a reliable and convenient biomarker to stratify high risk of death in patients with operable NSCLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, P., Shen, H., Wang, G., Zhang, P., Liu, Q., & Du, J. (2014). Prognostic significance of systemic inflammation-based lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with lung cancer: Based on a large cohort study. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free