The CRC as a litigation tool before the inter-american system of protection of human rights

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter examines how the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) has been used as a litigation tool before the Inter–American System of Protection of Human Rights. First, it argues that the CRC is used as a tool of litigation at the substantial level when construing the obligations of States Parties by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in individual complaints under the American Convention on Human Rights. Secondly, the chapter examines the way in which the CRC is also effectively used at a procedural level. It is submitted that far from departing from traditional interpretative rules under Public International Law, the Inter–American Court’s approach is, on the contrary, in accordance with the basic tools of treaty interpretation as enshrined in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. It is submitted that this is in agreement with keeping the unity of international law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feria-Tinta, M. (2015). The CRC as a litigation tool before the inter-american system of protection of human rights. In Litigating the Rights of the Child: The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in Domestic and International Jurisprudence (pp. 231–248). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9445-9_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free