Performance And Satisfaction In Adaptive Websites: An Experiment On Searches Within A Task-Adapted Website

  • Te'eni D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Finding information within websites is becoming an increasing challenge as the size and the complexity of websites soar. One possible solution is to adapt the view of the site to the task in hand. Although such a procedure is technically feasible, the effectiveness of such designs is yet to be tested. Assuming user scenarios that involve searches by browsing rather than structured queries, we build on models of searching in text to formulate a task representation of searches within websites. This task representation is used to model the effects of adapted websites on performance and satisfaction. We have, therefore, two main aims: (1) to propose a task representation of website searches, and (2) to use it to explore the effect of adaptive designs on performance and satisfaction. In an experiment with a simulated adaptive website, the impact of an adapted site is compared with that of a non-adapted site in terms of time, accuracy, and perceived complexity of completing a search task and satisfaction with the human- computer interaction. The results indicate that adapted sites improve performance but not overall satisfaction. A breakdown of the components of satisfaction reveals that users are unhappy with the changing menus. Part of the explanation may be their perceptions that adaptive sites are less consistent and, therefore, more complex.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Te’eni, D., & Feldman, R. (2001). Performance And Satisfaction In Adaptive Websites: An Experiment On Searches Within A Task-Adapted Website. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00015

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 27

77%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Researcher 2

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 18

49%

Business, Management and Accounting 13

35%

Engineering 4

11%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0