The missing link between “necessity” and “approximation of criminal sanctions” in the EU

  • De Bondt W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ever since the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty, the EU has had the competence to adjust national legislations via approximation instruments. In doing so, it has had the ability to influence the sanctions foreseen in the national criminal codes. The aim of this contribution is to review the scope of the EUs competence to approximate national criminal sanctions with a view to assessing (1) the existence of an EU policy with respect to the approximation of sanctions and (2) the extent to which the legal basis has been used in a consistent and correct way. The frequently stressed sensitivity of the matter and the reluctance of Member States to give up their national sovereignty when it comes to criminal law highlight the crucial need for a such policy and consistent and correct use of provisions. The contribution goes into the existing minimum maximum sanctions as well as possible future minimum minimum sanctions and maximum maximum sanctions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Bondt, W. (2014). The missing link between “necessity” and “approximation of criminal sanctions” in the EU. European Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.5235/219174414813522079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free