In this paper, I argue that Amie Thomasson’s Easy Ontology rests on a vicious circularity that is highly damaging. Easy Ontology invokes the idea of application conditions that give rise to analytic entailments. Such entailments can be used to answer ontological questions easily. I argue that the application conditions for basic terms are only circularly specifiable showing that Thomasson misses her self-set goal of preventing such a circularity. Using this circularity, I go on to show that Easy Ontology as a whole collapses.
CITATION STYLE
Raab, J. (2021). The unbearable circularity of easy ontology. Synthese, 199(1–2), 3527–3556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02946-z
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.