EEG and eye tracking signatures of target encoding during structured visual search

39Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

EEG and eye tracking variables are potential sources of information about the underlying processes of target detection and storage during visual search. Fixation duration, pupil size and event related potentials (ERPs) locked to the onset of fixation or saccade (saccade-related potentials, SRPs) have been reported to differ dependent on whether a target or a non-target is currently fixated. Here we focus on the question of whether these variables also differ between targets that are subsequently reported (hits) and targets that are not (misses). Observers were asked to scan 15 locations that were consecutively highlighted for 1 s in pseudo-random order. Highlighted locations displayed either a target or a non-target stimulus with two, three or four targets per trial. After scanning, participants indicated which locations had displayed a target. To induce memory encoding failures, participants concurrently performed an aurally presented math task (high load condition). In a low load condition, participants ignored the math task. As expected, more targets were missed in the high compared with the low load condition. For both conditions, eye tracking features distinguished better between hits and misses than between targets and non-targets (with larger pupil size and shorter fixations for missed compared with correctly encoded targets). In contrast, SRP features distinguished better between targets and non-targets than between hits and misses (with average SRPs showing larger P300 waveforms for targets than for non-targets). Single trial classification results were consistent with these averages. This work suggests complementary contributions of eye and EEG measures in potential applications to support search and detect tasks. SRPs may be useful to monitor what objects are relevant to an observer, and eye variables may indicate whether the observer should be reminded of them later.

References Powered by Scopus

FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data

6941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials

2640Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources

1368Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multimodal Fusion for Objective Assessment of Cognitive Workload: A Review

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Attention-aware brain computer interface to avoid distractions in augmented reality

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Eye-tracking reveals how observation chart design features affect the detection of patient deterioration: An experimental study

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brouwer, A. M., Hogervorst, M. A., Oudejans, B., Ries, A. J., & Touryan, J. (2017). EEG and eye tracking signatures of target encoding during structured visual search. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00264

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 48

62%

Researcher 16

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 28

40%

Neuroscience 20

29%

Engineering 16

23%

Computer Science 6

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free