Decision noise may mask criterion shifts: Reply to Balakrishnan and MacDonald (2008)

5Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

J. D. Balakrishnan and J. A. MacDonald (2008) argue that RTbased measures of signal detection processes provide evidence against signal detection theory's notion of a flexible decision criterion. They argue that this evidence is immune to the alternative explanation proposed by S. T. Mueller and C. T. Weidemann (2008), that decision noise may mask criterion shifts. We show that noise in response times can produce the same effects as are produced by noise in confidence ratings. Given these results, the evidence is not sufficient to categorically reject the notion of a flexible response policy implemented through shifts in a decision criterion. © 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weidemann, C. T., & Mueller, S. T. (2008, October). Decision noise may mask criterion shifts: Reply to Balakrishnan and MacDonald (2008). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.1031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free