Who tests, who doesn't, and why? Uptake of mobile HIV counseling and testing in the kilimanjaro region of Tanzania

51Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Optimally, expanded HIV testing programs should reduce barriers to testing while attracting new and highrisk testers. We assessed barriers to testing and HIV risk among clients participating in mobile voluntary counseling and testing (MVCT) campaigns in four rural villages in the Kilimanjaro Region of Tanzania. Methods: Between December 2007 and April 2008, 878 MVCT participants and 506 randomly selected community residents who did not access MVCT were surveyed. Gender-specific logistic regression models were used to describe differences in socioeconomic characteristics, HIV exposure risk, testing histories, HIV related stigma, and attitudes toward testing between MVCT participants and community residents who did not access MVCT. Gender-specific logistic regression models were used to describe differences in socioeconomic characteristics, HIV exposure risk, testing histories, HIV related stigma, and attitudes toward testing, between the two groups. Results: MVCT clients reported greater HIV exposure risk (OR 1.20 [1.04 to 1.38] for males; OR 1.11 [1.03 to 1.19] for females). Female MVCT clients were more likely to report low household expenditures (OR 1.47 [1.04 to 2.05]), male clients reported higher rates of unstable income sources (OR 1.99 [1.22 to 3.24]). First-time testers were more likely than non-testers to cite distance to testing sites as a reason for not having previously tested (OR 2.17 [1.05 to 4.48] for males; OR 5.95 [2.85 to 12.45] for females). HIV-related stigma, fears of testing or test disclosure, and not being able to leave work were strongly associated with non-participation in MVCT (ORs from 0.11 to 0.84). Conclusions: MVCT attracted clients with increased exposure risk and fewer economic resources; HIV related stigma and testing-related fears remained barriers to testing. MVCT did not disproportionately attract either first-time or frequent repeat testers. Educational campaigns to reduce stigma and fears of testing could improve the effectiveness of MVCT in attracting new and high-risk populations. © 2011 Ostermann et al.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ostermann, J., Reddy, E. A., Shorter, M. M., Muiruri, C., Mtalo, A., Itemba, D. K., … Thielman, N. M. (2011). Who tests, who doesn’t, and why? Uptake of mobile HIV counseling and testing in the kilimanjaro region of Tanzania. PLoS ONE, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016488

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 57

71%

Researcher 17

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 31

48%

Social Sciences 20

31%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

11%

Psychology 7

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free