Efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

12Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high-risk factors repre-sent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti-platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80– 0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78– 1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64– 0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,– 0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78– 2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23–1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37– 2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65– 0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66– 0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69– 0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41– 0.82) regimens. CONCLUSIONS: All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin mono-therapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all-cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long-term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high-risk factors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, H., Xu, X., Fang, X., Ying, F., Song, L., Gao, B., … Huang, J. (2021). Efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Heart Association. American Heart Association Inc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019184

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free