The importance of ulceration of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck: A comparison of ear (pinna) and nonear sites

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To compare clinicopathologic and prognostic factors associated with ear melanomas and nonear melanomas of the head and neck (H&N). Study Design: Post hoc analysis of the database from a multi-institutional, prospective, randomized study. Methods: Clinicopathologic factors were assessed and correlated with survival and recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed. Results: Of 405 patients with H&N melanomas ≥1.0 mm Breslow thickness, 59 patients had melanomas of the ear. Most were Caucasian (96.6%) males (79.7%) with a mean age of 52 years. The mean Breslow thickness was 2.5 mm; 34.5% had signs of ulceration. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity was seen in 7.1%. The incidence of locoregional and distant recurrence were similar. OS for ear melanoma was significantly impacted by ulceration status (P =.013), whereas both ulceration and SLN positivity predicted survival in nonear melanoma (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Augenstein, A. C., Capello, Z. J., Little, J. A., McMasters, K. M., & Bumpous, J. M. (2012). The importance of ulceration of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck: A comparison of ear (pinna) and nonear sites. Laryngoscope, 122(11), 2468–2472. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free