Intravenous lidocaine, a nonspecific Na-channel blocker, was used to assess the dental impaction model for evaluation of neuropathic pain drugs. Sixty patients, experiencing moderate or severe pain after removal of ≥ 2 third molars, were randomized (2:2:1:1) to lidocaine (4 mg/kg; maximal dose 300 mg), oxycodone/acetaminophen (10/650 mg), placebo, and active placebo (diphenhydramine, 50 mg). Lidocaine provided a modest degree of pain relief. Predefined endpoints of total pain relief and sum of pain intensity at 2, 4, and 6 hours showed numerically, not statistically significantly, greater pain relief versus placebo. A significantly greater effect over placebo was observed in peak effect and at shorter time points (30 minutes and 1 hour), consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile (plasma concentration of ∼2 μg/mL). Oxycodone/acetaminophen provided significantly greater analgesia versus placebo, validating study conduct, and significantly greater pain relief was observed versus lidocaine, which is consistent with a smaller portion of dental extraction pain being of neuropathic origin. ©2006 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Malmstrom, K., Kotey, P., McGratty, M., Ramakrishnan, R., Gottesdiener, K., Reicin, A., & Wagner, J. A. (2006). Dental impaction pain model as a potential tool to evaluate drugs with efficacy in neuropathic pain. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 46(8), 917–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270006289847