Relation of blood pressure variability to left ventricular function and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients

11Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Variability of blood pressure (BP) has been reported to be related to worse cardiovascular outcomes. We examined the impact of daytime systolic BP variability on left ventricular (LV) function and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients. METHODS Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and echocardiography were performed in 116 hypertensive patients. We assessed BP variability as standard deviations of daytime systolic BP on 24-hour ABPM. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, area strain and three-dimensional diastolic index (3D-DI) using 3D speckle tracking were measured. Arterial stiffness was evaluated by acquiring pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index. RESULTS Patients with higher BP variability showed significantly increased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and late mitral inflow velocity, as well as decreased E/A (early mitral inflow velocity/late mitral inflow velocity) ratio, area strain and 3D-DI than those with lower BP variability (LVMI: P = 0.02; A velocity: P < 0.001; E/A ratio: P < 0.001; area strain: P = 0.02; 3D-DI: P = 0.04). In addition, increased BP variability was associated with higher PWV and augmentation index (p < 0.001). Even among patients whose BP was well controlled, BP variability was related to LV mass, diastolic dysfunction and arterial stiffness. CONCLUSION Increased BP variability was associated with LV mass and dysfunction, as well as arterial stiffness, suggesting that BP variability may be an important determinant of target organ damage in hypertensive patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shin, S. H., Jang, J. H., Baek, Y. S., Kwon, S. W., Park, S. D., Woo, S. I., … Kwan, J. (2019). Relation of blood pressure variability to left ventricular function and arterial stiffness in hypertensive patients. Singapore Medical Journal, 60(8), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.11622/SMEDJ.2019030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free