Does screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care increase receipt of substance use disorder treatment?

  • Saitz R
  • Kim T
  • Bernstein J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Little is known about the efficacy of "RT" (referral to treatment) for increasing receipt of substance use disorder (SUD) treatment by patients with unhealthy drug use identified by screening. We compared receipt of SUD treatment between baseline and 6 months across three randomized groups: no intervention and two types of brief interventions. Methods: Adults presenting to a hospital-based primary care clinic with recent drug use (Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test [ASSIST] drug specific score >4) were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial comparing: (1) 10-15 min structured interview conducted by health educators (BNI), (2) 30-45 min intervention based on motivational interviewing by Masters-level counselors (MOTIV) or (3) no brief intervention. All received information on treatment resources. We assessed receipt of any SUD treatment in a statewide database. Logistic regression analyses adjusted for main drug (self-identified), drug dependence and past SUD treatment. Results: Among 528 participants the main drug was marijuana (63%), cocaine (19%), and opioids (17%); 46% met 12-month drug dependence criteria (Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form); 18% had ASSIST scores (>27) consistent with dependence (past 3-months). At 6 months, 14% (73/528) received any SUD treatment. There were no significant differences in SUD treatment receipt: BNI vs control (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.16, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.59, 2.30, Hochberg adjusted p-value = 0.66); MOTIV vs control (AOR 0.45, 95%CI: 0.21, 0.97, Hochberg adjusted p-value = 0.08). There were no significant interactions between intervention and main drug, severity (ASSIST), or prior SUD treatment. Conclusions: Brief intervention did not increase receipt of SUD treatment in primary care patients. Future research should address how to make referral to treatment successful among screenidentified patients who could benefit from it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saitz, R., Kim, T., Bernstein, J., Cheng, D. M., Samet, J., Lloyd-Travaglini, C., … German, J. (2015). Does screening and brief intervention for drug use in primary care increase receipt of substance use disorder treatment? Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 10(S2). https://doi.org/10.1186/1940-0640-10-s2-o46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free