Becoming a Mixed Methods Researcher: Successes, Failures, and Lessons Learned Along the Way

  • West C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I have to admit my first thought when asked to write a personal narrative was, ‘the last thing this world needs is another narcissistic self-proclamation.’ But as I thought about my personal journey as a music education mixed methods researcher, I realized there are relatively few of us out there right now and my story might inspire future music education mixed methods researchers on their journeys. In this narrative, I describe how I became a music education mixed methods researcher. Themes include the following: (a) QUAN master’s education, QUAL doctoral education—never the twain shall meet; (b) mixed methods was a taboo subject, which made it sexy; (c) wanting my own identity as a researcher; (d) doing it all backwards by starting with a method in mind and then developing the purpose statement and research questions; and (e) trying to publish mixed methods studies. From my first master’s-level research class to the initial seduction of mixed methods research which led to a new emerging identity, to my completely backward approach to conducting a study, to my subsequent publications and modest successes within the field, it has been a rewarding journey, and one that I hope is only beginning. Stories and narrative are used extensively throughout to create a light-hearted reflexive account of my successes, failures, and lessons learned along the way.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

West, C. (2018). Becoming a Mixed Methods Researcher: Successes, Failures, and Lessons Learned Along the Way (pp. 237–244). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90161-9_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free