A cost analysis of the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children in the UK

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A decision analysis was performed to model the effects and health economic differences of current UK management approaches to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged between 6 and 16 years. The approaches modelled were: medication using a standard immediate-release methylphenidate (MPH-IR) (once, twice or three times daily); medication using CONCERTA® XL* (OROS®* methylphenidate; MPH), a long-acting once-daily formulation of methylphenidate; or behavioural therapy (BEH). Starting treatment with BEH alone resulted in the highest annual cost (UK£2,147), while the costs of starting treatment with MPH-IR alone (£1,332), or OROS®* MPH alone (£1,362) were comparable. Treatment switches to behavioural treatment or combined treatment (medication and behavioural) due to treatment failure occurred in 11.8% of OROS®* MPH and 24.2% of MPH-IR patients. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were sensitive towards treatment success and the proportion of patients with comorbidities, although conclusions were not altered. UK treatment costs over 1 year appear comparable regardless of whether patients were treated first with OROS®* MPH or MPH-IR. Treating patients first with BEH and then adding stimulant medication if needed resulted in higher overall annual treatment costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vanoverbeke, N., Annemans, L., Ingham, M., & Adriaenssen, I. (2003). A cost analysis of the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children in the UK. Journal of Medical Economics, 6(79–94), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.3111/200306079094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free