Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

13Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of galcanezumab in the prophylactic treatment of adult migraine. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identity randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the decline in the number of monthly migraine days (MMDs). Secondary outcomes included the reduction of monthly acute migraine‑specific medication days (MSMDs), the number of participants showing a reduction in MMDs from baseline of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100%, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the number of participants developing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to galcanezumab. We calculated the mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for these outcomes. Results: Among the five included trials, galcanezumab given at doses of 120, 150, 240, and 300 mg was superior to placebo for both MMDs and secondary outcomes. The degree of AEs in all group was mild. Notably, no significant differences were found in the occurrence of AEs and ADAs between the galcanezumab and placebo groups. Conclusion: Galcanezumab is a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with episodic and chronic migraine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, X., Xu, X., & Li, Q. (2021, July 1). Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09707-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free