Pluralism and Together Incompatible Philosophies of Mathematics

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this chapter, the pluralist arbitrates between two philosophical positions: the extensionalist and the constructivist. Both are anti-realists of a sort. The extensionalist position is that of Quine, and is represented by Bar-Am. The constructivist position is that of Sunholm and Martin-Löf. The two merit comparison because they both give a sensitive account of the history of logic, moreover, they give much the same account. The two positions differ on their final judgment of the modern trend. The extensionalist sees progress where the constructivist sees emptiness. To draw out the differences, we shall also meet the formalist and the realist. We shall see the accord and disaccord between these positions, especially in respect of their attitude towards logic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friend, M. (2014). Pluralism and Together Incompatible Philosophies of Mathematics. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 32, pp. 219–237). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7058-4_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free