Universal healthcare in the united states of america: A healthy debate

18Citations
Citations of this article
249Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This commentary offers discussion on the pros and cons of universal healthcare in the United States. Disadvantages of universal healthcare include significant upfront costs and logistical challenges. On the other hand, universal healthcare may lead to a healthier populace, and thus, in the long-term, help to mitigate the economic costs of an unhealthy nation. In particular, substantial health disparities exist in the United States, with low socio–economic status segments of the population subject to decreased access to quality healthcare and increased risk of non-communicable chronic conditions such as obesity and type II diabetes, among other determinants of poor health. While the implementation of universal healthcare would be complicated and challenging, we argue that shifting from a market-based system to a universal healthcare system is necessary. Universal healthcare will better facilitate and encourage sustainable, preventive health practices and be more advantageous for the long-term public health and economy of the United States.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zieff, G., Kerr, Z. Y., Moore, J. B., & Stoner, L. (2020, November 1). Universal healthcare in the united states of america: A healthy debate. Medicina (Lithuania). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56110580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free