Imitation and conventional communication

38Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To the extent that language is conventional, non-verbal individuals, including human infants, must participate in conventions in order to learn to use even simple utterances of words. This raises the question of which varieties of learning could make this possible. In this paper I defend Tomasello's (The cultural origins of human cognition. Harvard UP, Cambridge, 1999, Origins of human communication. MIT, Cambridge, 2008) claim that knowledge of linguistic conventions could be learned through imitation. This is possible because Lewisian accounts of convention have overstated what one must know to participate in conventions; and because the required knowledge could be learned imitatively. The imitation claim that I defend is consistent with what we know about both the proliferation of conventional behaviours in human children, who are skilful imitators, and the comparative absence of such behaviours in non-human great apes, who are poor at imitative learning. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, R. (2013). Imitation and conventional communication. Biology and Philosophy, 28(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-012-9349-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free