Selection strategies for the development of maize introgression populations

12Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introgression libraries are valuable resources for QTL detection and breeding, but their development is costly and timeconsuming. Selection strategies for the development of introgression populations with a limited number of individuals and high-throughput (HT) marker assays are required. The objectives of our simulation study were to design and compare selection strategies for the development of maize introgression populations of 100 lines with population sizes of 360-720 individuals per generation for different DH and S2 crossing schemes. Pre-selection for complete donor chromosomes or donor chromosome halves reduced the number of simultaneous backcross programs. The investigated crossing and selection schemes differed considerably with respect to their suitability to create introgression populations with clearly separated, evenly distributed target donor chromosome segments. DH crossing schemes were superior to S2 crossing schemes, mainly due to complete homozygosity, which greatly reduced the total number of disjunct genome segments in the introgression populations. The S2 crossing schemes were more flexible with respect to selection and provided economic alternatives to DH crossing schemes. For the DH crossing schemes, increasing population sizes gradually over backcross generations was advantageous as it reduced the total number of required HT assays compared to constant population sizes. For the S2 crossing schemes, large population sizes in the final backcross generation facilitated selection for the target segments in the final backcross generation and reduced fixation of large donor chromosome segments. The suggested crossing and selection schemes can help to make the genetic diversity of exotic germplasm available for enhancing the genetic variation of narrow-based breeding populations of crops. © 2014 Herzog et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. Definition of the selection index i in generations BC1, BC2, BC3, DH, S1, S2 for different selection strategies for developing introgression populations.
  • Table 2. Subdivision of the total population sizes ntot into sub-population sizes ng in generations g~BC1,BC2,BC3,S1,DH,S2 for different crossing and selection schemes for developing introgression populations.
  • Table 3. Measures evaluated for introgression populations resulting from different crossing and selection schemes.
  • Figure 4. Donor genome proportion of target segments Ds for all investigated S2 crossing schemes. The boxplots represent the distribution over 1,000 replications of the simulations. The basic crossing schemes BC2S2{H, BC3S2{HH and BC3S2{CH which select for donor chromosome halves are characterized by higher ranges for Ds. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092429.g004

References Powered by Scopus

Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries

566Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice, Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines

291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: A tool for fine mapping of genes

285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Introgressiomics: a new approach for using crop wild relatives in breeding for adaptation to climate change

147Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Technological advances in maize breeding: past, present and future

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding and utilizing crop genome diversity via high-resolution genotyping

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Herzog, E., Falke, K. C., Presterl, T., Scheuermann, D., Ouzunova, M., & Frisch, M. (2014). Selection strategies for the development of maize introgression populations. PLoS ONE, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092429

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

84%

Researcher 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22

85%

Computer Science 2

8%

Mathematics 1

4%

Arts and Humanities 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0