Federalism and the management of the COVID-19 crisis: centralisation, decentralisation and (non-)coordination

64Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The ability of federal states to manage the COVID-19 pandemic has created much debate. Federations differ considerably in the way they have been tackling the crisis, however. To shed light on how European federations (Austria, Germany, Switzerland) managed COVID-19, this paper distinguishes two dimensions of federal decision making: centralised/decentralised and unilateral/coordinated decision making. Drawing on official government documents and press reports, it examines decisions on the introduction of containment measures and their subsequent easing during the first wave. While Austria and Switzerland adopted a centralised approach, decentralised decision making prevailed in Germany. However, most decisions were coordinated between the governments at the federal and constituent unit level in Austria and Germany, in contrast to Switzerland where unilateralism prevailed. This difference in approaches can partly be explained by the distribution of powers. Political and economic factors also influenced the choice of crisis management strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hegele, Y., & Schnabel, J. (2021). Federalism and the management of the COVID-19 crisis: centralisation, decentralisation and (non-)coordination. West European Politics, 44(5–6), 1052–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1873529

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free